Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby Wizard CaT » Sat May 22, 2010 10:02 am ... thCarousel
ROBERT LEE HOTZ wrote:Heralding a potential new era in biology, scientists for the first time have created a synthetic cell, completely controlled by man-made genetic instructions, researchers at the private J. Craig Venter Institute announced Thursday.

"We call it the first synthetic cell," said genomics pioneer Craig Venter, who oversaw the project. "These are very much real cells."

Created at a cost of $40 million, this experimental one-cell organism, which can reproduce, opens the way to the manipulation of life on a previously unattainable scale, several researchers and ethics experts said. Scientists have been altering DNA piecemeal for a generation, producing a menagerie of genetically engineered plants and animals. But the ability to craft an entire organism offers a new power over life, they said.

The development, documented in the peer-reviewed journal Science, may stir anew nagging questions of ethics, law and public safety about artificial life that biomedical experts have been debating for more than a decade.

"This is literally a turning point in the relationship between man and nature," said molecular biologist Richard Ebright at Rutgers University, who wasn't involved in the project. "For the first time, someone has generated an entire artificial cell with predetermined properties."

David Magnus, director of the Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics, said, "It has the potential to transform genetic engineering. The research is going to explode."

Leery of previous moral and ethical debates about whether it is right to manipulate life forms—which arose with the advent of cloning, stem-cell technology and genetic engineering—some researchers chose neutral terms to describe the experimental cell. Some played down the development.

"I don't think it represents the creation of an artificial life form," said biomedical engineer James Collins at Boston University. "I view this as an organism with a synthetic genome, not as a synthetic organism. It is tough to draw where the line is."

For the first time, scientists have created a synthetic cell, heralding a new era in biology. Shelly Banjo talks to Robert Lee Hotz about the huge implications of this development.

The new cell, a bacterium, was conceived solely as a demonstration project. But several biologists said they believed that the laboratory technique used to birth it would soon be applied to other strains of bacteria with commercial potential.

"I think this quickly will be applied to all the most important industrial bacteria," said biologist Christopher Voigt at the University of California, San Francisco, who is developing microbes that help make gasoline.

Several companies are already seeking to take advantage of the new field, called synthetic biology, which combines chemistry, computer science, molecular biology, genetics and cell biology to breed industrial life forms that can secrete fuels, vaccines or other commercial products.

Synthetic Genomics Inc., a company founded by Dr. Venter, provided $30 million to fund the experiments and owns the intellectual-property rights to the cell-creation techniques. The company has a $600 million contract with Exxon Mobil Corp. to design algae that can capture carbon dioxide and make fuel.

At least three other companies—Amyris Biotechnologies in Emeryville, Calif.; LS9 Inc. in San Francisco; and Joule Unlimited in Cambridge, Mass.—are working on synthetic cells to produce renewable fuels.

Although patents on single genes now face legal challenges, Dr. Venter said he intends to patent his experimental cells. "They are pretty clearly human inventions," he said.

Before making their work public, the researchers said, they briefed White House officials, members of Congress and officials from several government agencies. Within minutes of Thursday's announcement, the House Energy and Commerce Committee announced it would hold a public hearing on the new technology next week.

Environmental groups also reacted quickly. Friends of the Earth issued a statement asking the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration "to fully regulate all synthetic biology experiments and products," while ETC Group, a group based in Canada, called for a global moratorium on synthetic biology.

There was no immediate reaction from Roman Catholic and Protestant groups that have questioned such developments in the past. There was some support. "It is very much within divine mandate that we do these things," said theologian Nancey Murphy, who studies Christianity and science at the Fuller Theological Seminary, a multidenominational Christian seminary in Pasadena, Calif.

The announcement Thursday was the culmination of a project Dr. Venter and his colleagues have pursued since 1995. In a series of peer-reviewed papers, the group has published the interim technical steps. So far, that research has withstood scrutiny.

The latest research was reviewed by a panel of independent scientists, but no one has duplicated the team's experiment. Other researchers working on different approaches in the field found the report credible and said it combined a series of prior advances.

"They are pulling all the pieces together," said Drew Endy, a biologist at Stanford University who is president of the BioBricks Foundation, a nonprofit consortium organized by researchers from Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of California to make the DNA tools of synthetic biology freely available.

To make the synthetic cell, a team of 25 researchers at labs in Rockville, Md., and San Diego, led by bioengineer Daniel Gibson and Mr. Venter, essentially turned computer code into a new life form. They started with a species of bacteria called Mycoplasma capricolum and, by replacing its genome with one they wrote themselves, turned it into a customized variant of a second existing species, called Mycoplasma mycoides, they reported.

To begin, they wrote out the creature's entire genetic code as a digital computer file, documenting more than one million base pairs of DNA in a biochemical alphabet of adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine. They edited that file, adding new code, and then sent that electronic data to a DNA sequencing company called Blue Heron Bio in Bothell, Wash., where it was transformed into hundreds of small pieces of chemical DNA, they reported.

To assemble the strips of DNA, the researchers said they took advantage of the natural capacities of yeast and other bacteria to meld genes and chromosomes in order to stitch those short sequences into ever-longer fragments until they had assembled the complete genome, as the entire set of an organism's genetic instructions is called.

They transplanted that master set of genes into an emptied cell, where it converted the cell into a different species.

"We make a genome from four bottles of chemicals; we put that synthetic genome into a cell; that synthetic genome takes over the cell," said Dr. Gibson. "The cell is entirely controlled by that new genome."

The scientists didn't give the new organism its own species name, but they did give its synthetic genome an official version number, Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0.

To set this novel bacterium—and all its descendants—apart from any natural creation, Dr. Venter and his colleagues wrote their names into its chemical DNA code, along with three apt quotations from James Joyce and others. These genetic watermarks will, eventually, allow the researchers to assert ownership of the cells. "You have to have a way of tracking it," said Stanford ethicist Mildred Cho, who has studied the issues posed by the creation of such organisms.

Write to Robert Lee Hotz at SIgn up, why not?
~Only in silence the word, only in dark the light, only in dying life: bright the hawk's flight on the empty sky.~ The Creation of Éa
Damn you Clemson University, you deleted the 'sploding Kay that Etherwings uploaded eons ago!
User avatar
Wizard CaT
Watermelon Graduate

Posts: 904
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby Alfador » Sat May 22, 2010 11:20 am

Discovery! Our researchers have made a new breakthrough. Bio-Engineering (Prerequisites: Gene Splicing, Neural Grafting)
This new technology allows the following new unit abilities: Clean Reactor
This new technology allows the following new secret project: The Longevity Vaccine

(Yeah okay, so actually this is more like a secret project itself. "The Constructed Lifeform" or something.)
Arf! *wagwagwag*
User avatar
1000 Post Forum Master!

Posts: 1208
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Kirkland, WA

Re: Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby Plasman » Sun May 23, 2010 7:17 am

I read about this in the newspaper today. Apparently they've called the new life form {Synthia}. :lol:
And yes, there have been people worrying about "global plagues/grey goo scenario/possibly the end of the world" etc. etc. but do we even know what this new life form will actually do yet?
If this last post seems ridiculous, please disregard it. Thank you. ;)
By the way I made two level packs for Boppin' in case anyone is interested... :oops:
User avatar
1000 Post Forum Master!

Posts: 1143
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 8:23 am
Location: Australia

Re: Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby draque » Sun May 23, 2010 7:24 am

People seem to think that we could make a dangerous life form by accident... Nature, which is much better at making life than we are so far, tries as hard as it can 24/7 to make life forms better able to wreck their competitors and devour everything around themselves. We're at the stage where we're still trying to create life forms that can even reproduce in utterly controlled, sterile environments.

Which isn't to say that this is not unbelievably cool. Which it is. :3
User avatar
Watermelon Graduate

Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:57 am

Re: Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby Coda » Sun May 23, 2010 8:06 am

It seems to me that laboratory best practices would prevent a catastrophe scenario with BIOLOGICAL organisms. I'd be more worried about self-replicating nanomachines than bacteria.
User avatar
Magickal Melon 666

Posts: 762
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:19 pm
Location: Holy crap, Coda set an avatar

Re: Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby strange_person » Mon May 24, 2010 12:38 pm

Coda wrote:It seems to me that laboratory best practices would prevent a catastrophe scenario with BIOLOGICAL organisms. I'd be more worried about self-replicating nanomachines than bacteria.

I don't think either is going to happen any time soon.

Praise be to Athè, and Hob, Her living vessel.
For I have crescent pies to bake
And smiles to throw before I wake
User avatar
2000 Post Medal Of Wow!

Posts: 2274
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:09 pm

Re: Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby InterNutter » Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:22 pm

I'd like to order some cannibal bacteria please. Bacteria that hunt out and consume human-harmful bacteria within a specific environment. Say, my sinuses and lungs. Can y'all do that before I catch yet another rhinovirus and have to do battle with the little fuckers again?

I theorized that we'd eventually tame the rhinovirus and use it as a means of quickly immunizing the community [for increasingly broad definitions of 'community', natch]... Looks like I'll have to theorize faster, no?

Hope this doesn't fizzle out and fade away.
The sig is a lie
The sig is a lie
The sig is a lie
The sig is a lie...
User avatar
Kumquat Class Sensei

Posts: 208
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:24 pm
Location: Burpengary [seriously, it's real]

Re: Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby Ashes » Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:38 pm

Plasman wrote:Apparently they've called the new life form {Synthia}

Never lose your sense of humor, Science!

See also: NASA's love of acronyms.
User avatar
Melon Class

Posts: 565
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:09 am

Re: Scientists Create Synthetic Organism

Postby Goose in a jar » Sat Jun 26, 2010 11:59 pm

While most research into synthetic organisms and proteins is harmless in my opinion there is one thing that worries me so far.

Increasing the reading frame for transcription enzymes from the current three to four nucleotides, allows a fourfold increase in the number or proteins an organism can integrate into proteins assuming you retain the same level of redundancy.

This allows the incorporation of new amino acids potentially giving the synthetic organism a whole bunch of advantages unavailable to conventional lifeforms.

The argument that nature creates little monsters so much better than we can falls apart when you realize we can do things with life that it cannot by itself without rendering its entire genome to nonsense and dieing.
User avatar
Goose in a jar
Our New Friend

Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:01 pm

Return to The Political Arena

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests