GOP senators declare war on Net neutrality.

Postby RaharuAharu » Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:42 pm

http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/09/gop-se ... eutrality/

http://www.fark.com/cgi/comments.pl?IDLink=4652819 <-- Related Fark Thread.

GOP senators declare war on Net neutrality

Plan to keep Internet free of interference from ISPs draws opposition from GOP, service providers

Six Republican senators have introduced an amendment that would block the Federal Communications Commission from implementing its recently announced Net neutrality policy.

Texas Republican Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison introduced the amendment to an appropriations bill. It would prevent the FCC from getting funding for any initiative to uphold Net neutrality. According to The Hill, the co-sponsors are Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS), Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) Sen. John Ensign (R-NV), Sen. John Thune (R-SD) and Sen. David Vitter (R-LA).

The move appears to be an attempt to pre-empt the FCC's expected new policy to ensure that Internet service providers don't discriminate between different types of information on their networks.

On Monday, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski gave a speech in which he outlined the FCC's plan to enforce Net neutrality, a position President Barack Obama held during his campaign for president.

In recent years, concern has grown that some Internet service providers are slowing down "access to high speed Internet for things like Internet-based voice calls, video streaming, and legal file sharing (that carriers might wish to block or at least charge extra for)," writes Ian Paul at PCWorld magazine.

While Net neutrality is supported by Internet-reliant companies such as Google and Microsoft, it is opposed by major Internet service providers like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon. Those three have come out against Genachowski's plan, ChannelWeb reports.

The part of Genachowski's plan that ISPs are most opposed to, according to PCWorld's Paul, is that it would apply to mobile carriers as well -- cellphones, Blackberries and the like. Bandwidth for wireless is not infinite, and some carriers have argued that they need to shape some traffic on their networks in order to make sure there is space available for everyone.

But, as the experience of other countries has shown, that is not necessarily the way "traffic shaping" is used. In Canada, throttling some types of traffic on the Internet -- not on wireless -- has become commonplace. It is used to slow down peer-to-peer file sharing networks.

"Broadband providers cannot discriminate against particular Internet content or applications," Genachowski said in his speech. "Nor can they disfavor an Internet service just because it competes with a similar service offered by that broadband provider. The Internet must continue to allow users to decide what content and applications succeed."

“I am deeply concerned by the direction the FCC appears to be heading,” Sen. Hutchison said in a statement. “Even during a severe downturn, America has experienced robust investment and innovation in network performance and online content and applications. For that innovation to continue, we must tread lightly when it comes to new regulations."

A Net neutrality bill is expected to be introduced in the House of Representatives this fall.

-- Daniel Tencer


%<

I would say more, but I am too mad right now to comment.
Hello! *~( ! !)>
Alien Parachronism
Image
User avatar
RaharuAharu
1000 Post Forum Master!

  Offline
 
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:09 am

Re: GOP senators declare war on Net neutrality.

Postby Coda » Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:56 pm

In the interest of full disclosure, I'm a registered Republican, and I support net neutrality.

Conversely, in the interest of fair discussion, there are defensible arguments against it. Specifically, if you're talking about fostering technological innovation, forcing all service providers to treat all network traffic equally interferes with from providing innovative benefits to their own customers. Net neutrality would require these providers to supply free access to these features to any traffic passing through -- from this perspective, net neutrality basically boils down to "you can't QoS your network to the benefit of your customers."

Of course, lacking net neutrality requirements entirely means that you can have things like the big fiasco from a few years back where suddenly customers of competing ISPs were unable to route traffic through Level3's network.

As in all things, moderation is the necessary answer.
User avatar
Coda
Magickal Melon 666

  Offline
 
Posts: 762
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:19 pm
Location: Holy crap, Coda set an avatar

Re: GOP senators declare war on Net neutrality.

Postby Wizard CaT » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:07 pm

Coda wrote:As in all things, moderation is the necessary answer.


As in all things, the government will fuck it up anyway.
~Only in silence the word, only in dark the light, only in dying life: bright the hawk's flight on the empty sky.~ The Creation of Éa
Damn you Clemson University, you deleted the 'sploding Kay that Etherwings uploaded eons ago!
User avatar
Wizard CaT
Watermelon Graduate

  Offline
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Earth

Re: GOP senators declare war on Net neutrality.

Postby Coda » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:53 pm

Wizard CaT wrote:
Coda wrote:As in all things, moderation is the necessary answer.


As in all things, the government will fuck it up anyway.

Probably. But both sides are perfectly capable of doing that; no reason to be partisan. :P
User avatar
Coda
Magickal Melon 666

  Offline
 
Posts: 762
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:19 pm
Location: Holy crap, Coda set an avatar


Return to The Political Arena

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron